Search the site
Risks: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, ACCC, No justice in legal system for franchisees, Court decision favorable to franchisees, Franchisor association still maintains fiction
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20080222-franchisors-raising
-paw, Dehumanization, Court decision favorable to franchisees, Courts extremely picky about shoddy disclosure practices, Credence goods: taking advantage of the innocents, Credibility, Disclosure
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20100809-ontario-courts
, self, Contracts seen as unenforceable or void, Court decision favorable to franchisees, David and Goliath story, Debt traps, Deceptive business practices, Externalities: cheap business decision when
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20120625-court-rules
lawyers, not franchisees, Class action only as good as the lawyers involved, Class-action dead end, Coerced waiver of legal rights, self, Contracts seen as unenforceable or void, Court decision favorable
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20120626-court-rules
, Contracts seen as unenforceable or void, Court decision favorable to franchisees, David and Goliath story, Debt traps, Deceptive business practices, Externalities: cheap business decision when someone
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20120626-revolutionary-decision
the franchisees of their rights in order to qualify for full entitlement of the soda funds. NFA is hoping for a judicial declaration in the matter. It is asking the court for a judgment in its favor and against
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20090509-franchisee-class
waiver of legal rights, self, Contracts seen as unenforceable or void, Court decision favorable to franchisees, David and Goliath story, Debt traps, Deceptive business practices, Externalities: cheap
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20120625-quebec-franchisees
of legal rights, self, Contracts seen as unenforceable or void, Court decision favorable to franchisees, David and Goliath story, Debt traps, Deceptive business practices, Externalities: cheap business
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20120625-dunkin-donuts
and remand” further proceedings to the district court, denying the franchisor’s arguments for appeal.
In hearing the appellate decision, Harry M. Rifkin, attorney representing the franchisees, said
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20110324-court-rules
. The suit claims that Cardinal in March 2009 moved to renegotiate franchise agreements with the dwindling network of fewer than 700 pharmacies that would give franchisees more favorable terms, including
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20100310-medicine-shoppe
