Search the site
up in lab coats.”
Although there was no evidence anyone was ever harmed by the way Great Glasses conducted its business, the Bergezes’ contempt for the court orders was “too bizarre for fiction
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20101125-unlicensed-optician
free eye tests and they are saying goodbye to the controversial automated testing process that saw founders Bruce and Joanne Bergez found guilty of criminal contempt of court.
The couple was also found
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20100705-great-glasses
costs. “The greatest failing of all was [the parent company’s] failure to protect its brand in the Quebec market,” Quebec Superior Court Justice Daniel Tingley said in a blistering judgment released
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20120626-court-rules
costs. “The greatest failing of all was [the parent company’s] failure to protect its brand in the Quebec market,” Quebec Superior Court Justice Daniel Tingley said in a blistering judgment released
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20120625-court-rules
hearing.
Great Glasses founder Bruce Bergez and his wife will be sentenced Oct. 1 for criminal and civil contempt for flagrantly defying a number of court orders for the past seven years.
Superior
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20100824-great-glasses
scourge of the legal system — was back in town.
When last heard from in 1999, Mr. Clark was disbarred after criminal convictions for contempt of court — related to his repeated raising
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20031022-firebrand-former
contempt-of-court penalty against Mr. Bergez for ignoring a cease-and-desist court judgment issued three years earlier, plus a $50,000-per day fine if he continued operating the same way.
The Globe
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20080712-embattled-eyeglasses
people , Brand backlash: franchisees suffer because brand owners screw up, Bootstrapping the assets of a corporation, Can't collect on court decision, Contempt of court, Deceptive business practices
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20120724-liquidator-appointed
the ordinance has been legally challenged.
The suit, filed June 17 in U.S. District Court, claims the investors’ constitutional rights are being violated and allege that racism could be a factor
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20100702-company-sues
inexperience tripped him up, and he ended up being found in contempt of court in two related cases in Saskatoon and Calgary. In one case, the judge ruled Mr. Killoran distributed documents he
http://infofranpro.wikidot.com/20060310-judges-decry-judges-decry-trend-of-citizens-playing
