Target's deadline for closures puts pharmacies in 'catch-22', CBC News

Dan Dimovski, the president of the Pharmacy Franchisee Association of Canada, said Target has given its pharmacists until Feb. 26 to shut down their franchises inside the stores. But he said that's impossible because they have to follow provincial regulations to close.

www.cbc.ca
February 6, 2015

Target's deadline for closures puts pharmacies in 'catch-22'
Pharmacies want moving expenses to be covered and want to operate until the stores close
CBC News

target.jpg


Independent pharmacists are asking to be recognized in Target's bankruptcy filings and want more time to relocate their businesses. (Darren Calabrese/Canadian Press)

The closure of Target stores across the country has pharmacists scrambling.

Both the Sudbury and North Bay stores have pharmacies.

Dan Dimovski, the president of the Pharmacy Franchisee Association of Canada, said Target has given its pharmacists until Feb. 26 to shut down their franchises inside the stores.

But he said that's impossible because they have to follow provincial regulations to close.

“We're talking about medications, processes to protect the patient and our position in our association is the actions of Target are undermining the Canadian processes that protect the patients on a provincial level,” he said.

Dimovski noted pharmacists must apply for accreditation 30 days before moving to a new location. If they are closing, they need to ensure their stock of medications is transferred to another pharmacy or returned to the supplier.

“We're in a catch-22 situation,” Dimovski continued.

“We don't have approval in the province of Ontario, where the majority of franchisees are, to make these transfers or make these changes in less time. And honestly there is a reason for that period of time. They need to verify that the pharmacies that have relocated or moved comply and have all the things necessary for patient care.”

PFAD represents more than 80 independent pharmacies operating in Targets across the country.

The association has taken legal action to be recognized in Target's bankruptcy case and is drafting letters to premiers and MPs highlighting the concerns of independent pharmacists over the imminent store closures.

Dimovski said the association wants to be recognized in Target's bankruptcy process, and is asking for their moving expenses to be covered and to be able to operate until the store closes.

The U.S. retail chain announced in January it will close all its locations in Canada. There are 133 stores across the country with about 17,600 employees.

Target Canada did not respond to a request for comment.

Comments

1. LesStewartMBA
The Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, AWA is the ON and de facto CDN franchise law. 2010 was the last attempt to strengthen it to protect the 40,000 ON franchise families (up to $8-billion sunk cost investments, 600,000 employees)

Tim Hortons's franchisor got the job done by defeating the modernization of this 1960s-era law. These prospectus-like documents form the basis of any rational business due diligence. Since 1970 the US FTC has ensured that US small business families can access these documents publicly.

ON Ministry of Government and Consumer Services said this to me about the current Hortons (96,000 jobs, "down-and-dirty CCAA"?) mess:

"The AWA does not require disclosure documents to be publicly available or provided to the ministry
• The ministry does not intervene in disputes among franchisees and franchisors
• We would encourage you to contact Tim Horton’s directly for the information you are seeking
• Included in the Minister’s mandate letter is a commitment to ensure Ontario has modern laws that facilitate an efficient market and prosperous business climate
• To meeting this commitment, the ministry is reviewing 19 corporate and commercial statutes, including the AWA"

I replied to the Ministry that I had asked 3G Capital for a copy of their CDN disclosure documents and would keep them informed of 3Gs response.

I have the USA Hortons documents because they are free to download (without a salesman breathing down your neck) in 4, soon to be 5 (New York) states. None of the 5 (soon to be 6) of the CDN franchise provincial laws require an online repository of these crucial due diligence documents.

"Efficient market and prosperous business climate" for mom-and-pop CDN franchisees?

Les Stewart
FranchiseFool WikiFranchise FranchiseBanker

2. Tante C
The current leadership of Target Corp has the Dayton forefathers spinning in their graves. The secret to the Dayton family success was impeccable preparation in everything they did. (For those who don't know, the Dayton family started a department store in Minneapolis, MN in 1902, sixty years later they opened the first Target store.) The Dayton who set up the first Target store monitored it closely and tweaked the merchandise on a continuous basis finding what did and didn't work. That manner of doing business was maintained as the chain expended. Back in my youth, that attention to detail was so strong that what was available on in a Target in St. Louis Park might not be stocked in Roseville (site of the first store). Obviously, this attention to detail is no longer part of the corporate culture, pity - and sorry a MN company has let you down.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/sudbury/target-s-deadline-for-closures-puts-pharmacies-in-catch-22-1.2947877


Risks: $50,000 Ontario Appeal award for one franchisee's pain and suffering, 95 per cent of legal fees are paid by franchisors, Activism over the internet, Advice from franchise lawyer only, Agree with proposed law or you get nothing, Anonymous: leaderless on-line resistance subculture, Appropriate franchise law, Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, Canada, Arthur Wishart Amendment Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2010, Canada, Attorney seeds the destruction of his own client's case, Bad faith and unfair dealings, Bank calls in debt, Bank won't finance deal because they know something you don't, Banks are industry cheerleaders, Big Franchising, Big Pharma, Blame themselves, Blocking for the industry, Blogs: most effective means to justice, Brand backlash: franchisees suffer because brand owners screw up, Breach of duty, Business model had never created adequate investor returns, Buying a job, Call for a public enquiry, Call for franchise law, Canada Small Business Financing program, Cannon fodder, Career Limiting Move, CLM, Caveat emptor canard, Class action only as good as the lawyers involved, Coerced waiver of punitive damages, Comments on article are interesting, Commercially reasonable exercise of discretion, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, CCAA, Contingency fees, Contracts seen as unenforceable or void, Courts extremely picky about shoddy disclosure practices, Credence good fraudulent expert, Credence goods: taking advantage of the innocents, Cruelest lies are often told in silence, Disclosure document must disclose all material facts, Dispute resolution means franchisee goes broke, Don’t owe your lawyer money, Don't use a brand name franchise lawyer, Down-and-dirty CCAA, Employees misclassified as franchisees or independent contractors, Exponential increase in franchise bar services ($ and influence), Externalities: cheap business decision when someone else pays, Fair dealings: treat assets as if they were their own, False assumptions, multiple, Federal insolvency laws used to shirk legal claims, Fee reduction always has a catch, Fee surprises at settlement time, First we kill the lawyers…, Franchise banker, Franchise bubble will crash much harder (non-franchised), Franchise bar: Serving those most able to pick up the tab, Franchisee consultant, Franchisee leader, Franchisee revolt, Franchisee-on-franchisee opportunism, Franchisees are practice clients that help keep the lights on until franchisor clients show up, Franchisees dragged into complex legal dispute their franchisor created, Franchisee, independent contractor or employee?, Franchising Opportunism paper, Franchisor abandonment, Franchisor controls both wholesale costs and retail prices, Franchisor insolvency, intentional, Franchisor knew they were selling money losing concepts, Franchisors want the minimum regulation they can get away with, Fraudulent non-disclosure, Frenzied lobbying, Futility of taking legal action, Good faith + fair dealings = false hope, Government guaranteed loans, Government guaranteed loans, abolish program, Government guaranteed loans used a great deal in franchising, Government guaranteed loans, massive loan defaults, Government guaranteed loans: program loses $1, franchisee families lose $10, Gripe sites, Hacktivists: internet social justice activists, Hates publicity, Harassment, Intimidation, Hope springs eternal in the hearts of the delusional, Ideas once outrageous are now considered normal, Imbalance of information and power, Immigrants as prey, Independent franchisee association, Independent franchisee association betrayal, Individuals with a very successful career history, Industry Canada, Insolvency laws need to protect franchisees as well, Insolvency strips employees' severance payments, Insolvency trustee, consultant and auditor same firm, Intentional franchisor insolvency creates huge fees for legal, accounting, consulting firms, Internet information sharing, Investors steered to specific attorney, Jealously guarded monopoly on the provision of legal services, Joint Employer: franchisor legally liable along with franchisee for labour violations, Knew or could have reasonably been expected to know, Lawsuits, individual, Lawyering up without 2nd opinion is a trap, Lawyers can serve franchisors or franchisees, never both, Leaderless Franchise Network, LFN, Leadership development, Lease obligations make franchisees pay even if not in business, Lender's due diligence not done properly, Lending duty, Lending duty never enforced via regulation or litigation, Lending is subject to expert fraud because it is a credence good service, Les Stewart, Loan repudiation, Loser pays court costs, Material facts were not disclosed, Materially misleading information, McLaw: toothless legislation designed to protect the dominant parties, Ministry of Government and Consumer Services, Ontario, Mom-and-Pop franchisees at greatest risk, Money influencing public decision-making, Moral Hazard: a party insulated from risk behaves differently than if the full risk were present, Most lucrative form of commercial lending, franchising, Network effects: unintended consequences when dealing with communities, No real penalties for abuse of federal insolvency laws, Odious debts, Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, Canada, Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments, Canada, On Cooling the Mark Out (Erving Goffman), One franchisee turned against the other (action very difficult), Online reputation grows exponentially, Operating losses from Day 1, Opinions at odds with the Minister, Opportunism Test: If asset ownership were reversed, would decision likely change?, Overconfidence effect, Pawns in a game they can't win, Political champions, Predatory franchise lending, Privacy laws violated, Punitive, exemplary and/or aggravated damages, Regulatory capture breeds its own incompetence, Reputational risk, Restructuring legislation is deficient. Reverse onus on good faith and fair dealing, Right to associate and right to harass, Rules for Radicals: make them play by their own rules, Secured creditors (banks) 100% covered in dodgy insolvency, Settlement just covers fees, Shame - humiliation emotion, Sharecropping, Shareholder activism forces franchisor action, Shill, Sincere ignorance, Sincerity, Situationism psychology: people are influenced by external factors more than internal traits, Social media triggers unskilled franchisor reaction, Social proof: in new situations, you assume others know more so you follow their lead, Sophism: an argument used to deceive, Spouse can sue for losses also, Spouse dragged into negative investment, Spouse needs independent advice, State refuses to even listen, State sanction, Stores shuttered, Strategic lawsuit against public participation, SLAPP, Sub-prime lending practices done in franchising, Sue lender for failing to do their lender's due diligence, Sue the lawyer that created the disclosure document, Sunk Cost Fallacy: very hard to resist putting good money after bad, Sunshine is the best disinfectant, Suppliers and landlords act as if they were the franchisor, Symbiotic relationships (industry, banks, lawyers), Talk to former franchisees, Taxpayers end up paying for private gain, Test for franchisee, independent contractor or employee, The burned hand teaches best, The Fixer fixes for a hefty price, The key is to commit crimes so confusing that police feel too stupid to even write a crime report about them, Thin-skinned politicians not doing their duty, Threats against supporters of franchisee association, Trade association fronts and defends best and worst franchisors, Unskilled and unaware bias (Dunning–Kruger effect), Vacuum of information favours dominant party, Wage theft, Victims are highly intelligent and educated, War of attrition, What does the independent franchisee association say?, White-knight lawyer turns black, Who pays for the research?, Wiki: a franchisee-created wiki made from your franchisor's documents, Wives free to sue franchisor, Write a letter of complaint, Canada, 20150206 Targets deadline

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License