Tim Hortons layoffs blindsided workers, manager says, Sophia Harris

Jane is not her real name. She wants that withheld for fear she will face repercussions from the company if it discovers she’s speaking out.

CBC News
January 29, 2015

Tim Hortons layoffs blindsided workers, manager says
Company had played down speculation about mass job cuts
Sophia Harris


Long-serving Tim Hortons employees were blindsided by sudden layoffs at the ubiquitous coffee chain this week. (Canadian Press)

They didn’t see it coming. That’s what a laid-off Tim Hortons manager tells CBC News.

Instead, she says, just days before job cuts were announced, the company played down media speculation about mass layoffs and gave employees the impression they shouldn’t worry.

So when Tim Hortons started doling out pink slips at its headquarters and regional offices across the country on Monday and Tuesday, she says, "it was really shocking."

"We all anticipated something happening. I don't think any of us assumed it was going to happen so fast. There was just no transition time and it was pretty much, these guys came in, your job is gone."

"It was just really sour, really ominous," continues Jane. "You could just see a steady flow of people being escorted from the building."

Jane is not her real name. She wants that withheld for fear she will face repercussions from the company if it discovers she’s speaking out.

Holding it close
U.S.-based Burger King bought Tim Hortons last year. The company has remained tight-lipped about the layoffs, refusing to make public how many jobs were cut. Until the axe fell, more than 2,000 people worked at Tim Hortons corporate offices and distribution centres in Canada.

Jane estimates 40 per cent of staff may have been laid off from head office in Oakville, Ont. She had worked in middle management. In her department, she says 60 per cent of employees were cut. She also believes some other departments were entirely gutted.

Late yesterday an official in the office of Industry Minister James Moore told CBC News that Burger King had committed to cutting no more than 20 per cent of Tim Hortons corporate staff at its headquarters or regional offices. The official said that commitment was legally binding.

Don’t worry about it
Jane says when Burger King took over, it gave no indication there would be big layoffs. Instead, she says the company told Tim Hortons head office staff, "'We’re here for you guys. We’re here to respect you as employees, empower you,’ and pretty much tried to give us the impression that everything’s going to be fine."

She admits staff were told there would be "minimal" job cuts but adds that the company also stated there would be "great opportunities" for other employees.

Jane learned about the looming cuts from the media. News reports this past Friday speculated about significant job losses at Tim Hortons offices. But then, she says the company downplayed the trouble ahead.

She showed CBC an email from Burger King head office, sent that Friday night shortly after 9 p.m. It stated that "Much of the information that was reported today [in the media]…is simply incorrect."

The email admits that "Yes, we will be changing our structure." But the letter also states that the company will treat employees respectfully.

It concludes by stating, "We have nothing to announce at this time, however we are committed to communicating with you as soon as we are in a position to do so."

Surprise! You’ve lost your job
Jane says the big layoffs that were announced the following Monday and Tuesday hardly showed respect for employees.

She explains that on Monday, some of the more senior vice-presidents were let go. She also says a team from an external outplacement agency arrived "to essentially perform all the dirty work."

She says the team set up shop in offices left vacant by the laid-off executives "and called us in one at a time, letting us know that this is your package, you’re on your way out and we’ll escort you to the door."

"It was just really poorly executed," says Jane, because employees got no adequate warning. "There was a lot of crying, just emotion running high in the office."

Sign of the times
While employees may be feeling blindsided by the news, it comes as no surprise to Carleton University business professor Ian Lee. "This goes on in almost every merger today."

He explains that when a big company takes over another, it identifies overlapping jobs and lays off people to cut the fat.

"So if you have a marketing department at Burger King and a marketing department at Tim Hortons, you look for anywhere you can get rid of people."

More than one side
Not everyone connected with the company sees the layoffs as bad news. Archibald Jollymore is a former Tim Hortons executive and franchise owner. His wife Anne still owns a Tim Hortons franchise in which he is actively involved.

About the layoffs, Jollymore says, "I’m certainly not surprised at them organizing or reorganizing and trying to streamline the company. That’s totally understandable.” He adds that the restructuring "could be a good thing."

He also doesn’t fear the layoffs will hurt business. "If at the store level, the customer doesn't see a change, I don't think it's going to [have an] impact."

But for Jane, the cuts have permanently sullied her view of Tim Hortons. "I was proud to be part of a company that I thought was part of our culture and national identity."

"But then being part of it and being shown behind the curtains, that whole illusion got quickly swept away. It's just a corporation like any other corporation."


Brought to you by WikidFranchise.org

Risks: 101 ways to terminate a contract, 95 per cent of legal fees are paid by franchisors, Able to finance and sell negative cash flow franchise on crooked appraisals, Abuse of business, regulatory & political authority can destroy people, Afraid to talk, Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, Canada, Authority and credibility of the state used to favor a specific corporation, Bank Act, Canada, Bank won't finance deal because they know something you don't, Banks, Banks are industry cheerleaders, Blocking for the industry, Brand backlash: franchisees suffer because brand owners screw up, Breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, Broken relationships, ruined lives and alienated children, Bullshit baffles brains, Canada Small Business Financing Act, Canada Small Business Financing program, Call for state to investigate their undue influence, Can’t talk to media, Canada: An unwise place to invest, Canadian competition rules a farce, Canadian Franchise Association, CFA, Can't buy local producers' products, Can't buy lower priced products, Can't talk to politicians, Cat's-paw: being used unwittingly to do another’s bidding, Churning (serial reselling), Class-action dead end, Close store if staff unionizes, Co-branding forces untried/loser business model onto existing franchisees, Commercially reasonable exercise of discretion, Company man, Competence, Confidentiality agreements mask opportunism, Contempt for democracy, Courts extremely picky about shoddy disclosure practices, Cross-default provisions (lose one store, you lose them all), Cruellest lies are often told in silence, Current franchisees can’t talk freely, Deceptive business practices, Defrauding the public, Deny expansion because of media, political or association involvement, Disclosure document must disclose all material facts, Disclosure document is so deficient it is ruled no disclosure, Disclosure documents never given, Discount programs destroy retail margins but boost wholesale profits, Dissent, Divide and conquer, Divorce, Dog and Pony show, Encroachment (too many outlets put in territory), Expropriation without compensation, Externalities: cheap business decision when someone else pays, Forced to spend on renovations, Franchise agreements are so complex, they are breached the moment they're signed, Franchise investors deprived of information, Franchised store converted to corporate store, Franchisee-on-franchisee opportunism, Franchisees not the only ones at risk, Franchising is the most lucrative form of commercial lending, Franchisor controls both wholesale costs and retail prices, Franchisor has right to buy outlet before anyone else, Franchisor must approve new buyer, Franchisor overcharges for required products, Franchisor picks up stores for a song, Franchisor takes store and converts to corporate, Gouging on supplies, Government as system’s ultimate liar, Government guaranteed loans, Government guaranteed loans used a great deal in franchising, Government guaranteed loans, massive loan defaults, Government guaranteed loans: program loses $1, franchisee families lose $10, Industry Canada, Gross margin controlled by franchisor, Half-truths, Happy serfs, Head lease advantage, Hidden agenda, Higher short-term ROI to franchisor when churned (versus royalties), Hubris, I own the assets but the franchisor controls them, Illusion of government oversight, Imbalance of information and power, Incompetent or predatory: for the small business investor, the outcome is the same, Jealously guarded monopoly on the provision of legal services, Joint Employer: franchisor held legally liable along with franchisee for franchisee's actions, Lease controlled by franchisor, Lease margins are an important source of franchisor revenue, Lease obligations make franchisees pay even if not in business, Lending duty, Lipstick on a pig, Massive defaults, Material facts were not disclosed, Materially misleading information, Media is not interested in some stories, Mergers and acquisitions, Mergers and acquisitions: nearly half fail financially, Military pension will delay financial collapse, Military pension will subsidize the intentionally-designed deadbeat outlet, Ministry of Government and Consumer Services, Ontario, Misrepresentations, Model of de-regulated free-marketeers, Moral Hazard: a party insulated from risk behaves differently than if the full risk were present, Most lucrative form of commercial lending, franchising, Multi-tradename franchisors are often the most ruthless, Must buy only through franchisor (tied buying), Must lease, not buy, land and/or building, Must pay future royalties, even when the franchise fails (liquidated damages), Must sell business (eventually) through franchisor, Must work only as a franchisee, National cultural icon?, National press coverage, New franchisor may be nastier than the old one, New franchisor means worse deal, Next to impossible to sell any franchise, No franchisor support, Non-compete restrictions, Nothing but cold calculation, Offered much less than market value of franchise, Old-fashioned idea that politicians are relevant, On Cooling the Mark Out (Erving Goffman), Only 3 ways out: resell to next loser, independence & be sued or abandon and go bankrupt, Only offered a fraction of what business is worth, Opportunism Test: If asset ownership were reversed, would decision likely change?, Opportunism: contract creates powers which are used to strip investor value during relationship, Opportunism: self-interest with deceit, Opportunity Knocks, John Lorinc, Outstanding investigative journalism, Past the Tipping Point of public contempt for franchising, Pawns in a game they can't win, Personal assets pledged to cover business, Polishing a turd of an argument, Politicians helping their friends, Predatory franchise lending, Predatory franchising makes more money selling than operating system, Private equity, Profits from one franchise system sucked out to subsidize another one, Punished for talking to peers, Punished for talking to press, Punitive, exemplary and/or aggravated damages, Rate of return on investment, Rebranding financed by adding more government guaranteed loan, Rebranding is a great way to raise franchisor revenue, Refranchising: corporate stores converted to franchised, Refusal to renew contract, Refuses to answer journalist's questions, Register franchisees and franchisors, Regulator already has enough power but they don't use it, Regulatory capture breeds its own incompetence, Renewal of contract contingent on franchisee waiving all legal rights, Renewing contract much tougher, Rent increases, Reputation management, Reputation risk, Resale or transfer store through franchisor to new franchisee, Resale permission unreasonably withheld, Resale value set by franchisor, Resales (after termination) seen as a profit center, Restrict gag orders, Restructuring is used to cull dealers, Retaliation, Return on investment, Reverse onus on good faith and fair dealing, Ridicule, Right of first refusal, Right to associate, Right to associate and right to harass, Right to associate means the right to collective bargaining, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, RCMP, Royalty payments withheld, Run by franchisees, for franchisees, Run the billable hour clock, Same-store sales drop, Secret kickbacks and rebates, Self-represented litigants, Selling franchises same as stocks, mutual funds, lending, and securities, Sharecropping, Shareholder activism forces franchisor action, Shills, Shocked, I tell you: just shocked, Short- or forced-shipping, Short-term profits to franchisor much higher with cannon fodder investors, Should anyone trust anything associated with franchising anymore?, Shunned, Sign away human rights and legal remedies, Sincerity, Situationism psychology: people are influenced by external factors more than internal traits, Smartest guy in the room, Social justice, Social media triggers unskilled franchisor reaction, Sold for as much as much as they can get (next-to worthless), Sold only to people with no small business experience (very naïve), Sold useless or inappropriate equipment, Solicitor-client privilege used to shield white-collar crime (self and others), Some of the nastiest predators run several tradename systems, Sophism: an argument used to deceive, Spouse can sue for losses also, Spouse dragged into negative investment, Spouse must never sign any document, Spouse needs independent legal advice, State refuses to even listen, State sanction, Stock manipulation alleged, Stock price plummets, Stopped paying royalties, Stores shuttered, Strategic lawsuit against public participation, SLAPP, Strong back and weak mind, Sue lender for failing to do their lender's due diligence, Sue the bank, Sue the lawyer, Sue the lawyer that created the disclosure document, Sunk costs, Sunk costs: franchisee's trapped capital keeps them chained to treadmill, Supplier kickbacks, Suppliers and landlords act as if they were the franchisor, Supply margins are a hidden added royalty payment, Survivability (franchisee and franchisor), Symbiotic relationships (industry, banks, lawyers), System designed to fail for franchisees, Take what I give you or abandon 100% of your investment, Take what you're given for a law or you get nothing, Talk to former franchisees, Tax subsidy, Taxpayers end up paying for private gain, Termination of franchisee, mass, Termination threats, Terrorizing franchisees, Test for franchisee, independent contractor or employee, The key is to commit crimes so confusing that police feel too stupid to even write a crime report about them, The Long Con: prick your own IPO bubble, walk and keep your mouth shut, The Toronto Star, Threatening staff, Threats against franchisee advocates, Threats against supporters of franchisee association, Threats of lawsuits, Threats toward politicians by franchisors, Tied contracting, Tier 2 lawyers, Time delays makes collection of future court awards impossible, Tobacco industry-type defence, token gesture, Tony Martin, Tougher to sell franchises, Towers of gold, feet of clay, Trade association fronts and defends best and worst franchisors, Trade association membership a bogus "Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval", Trade association tells elected officials how to do their job, Trap for the trusting, Trial decision always appealed, U.S. expansion is graveyard for many Canadian businesses, U.S. Small Business Administration, SBA, Uncharacteristically shy with media requests, Undue influence, Uniform Franchise Offering Circular, UFOC (FDD), Unilateral changes in business model drive franchisees' profits down, Unilateral fines, Unionization, Unions hold management accountable, Unreasonably withholds consent, Unrelated franchisor investment sinks franchise system, Unsafe at any Brand?, Unskilled and unaware bias (Dunning–Kruger effect), Unsophisticated buyers, Uttering threats, Vacuum of information favours dominant party, Veil of secrecy, Vendor incentives, Veterans Transition Franchise Initiative, VetFran, VetFran has lots of predatory systems, VetFran: fish in a barrel, Waiver of legal rights, Wanted: sheep, Watchdog fails to bark, We will bankrupt you, Wealth is meant to be re-distributed (not created), Were in default for some time: why terminate now?, What does the independent franchisee association say?, When fraud is alleged, politician turns to group that represents perpetrators, When the franchisor tanks, so does the franchisee, Who selected these allegedly moron franchisees in the first place?, Why franchisors sublease to franchisees, Why should we care? It's not our money., WikidFranchise.org, Wiki: a franchisee-created wiki made from your franchisor's documents, Wild West of the business world, Wilful blindness, Will work even when Variable costs > than Selling price, Withholding fees is extremely hazardous, Wives free to sue franchisor, Won't get fooled again, Workplace bullying, Workplace violence, Would you advise anyone to buy into your system?, You get what you pay for as a franchisee, You may not be the 1st but you could be the next, You'll sign anything to get 15% of what you put into it back, Canada, 20150129 Tim hortons

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License