Tragic tale a 'classic injustice'

"There is something terribly wrong when the franchisee is left penniless despite winning in court." It gave heart to "rogue franchisors" who could continue to destroy franchisees' lives and livelihoods "knowing full well that the chances of ACCC intervention are minimal and the risk of a franchisee taking legal action is extremely low".

http://www.smh.com.au
August 11, 2010

Tragic tale a 'classic injustice'
Chalpat Sonti

The case of a Perth man locked in a desperate legal fight against automotive giant Auto Masters shows the depths one of Australia's largest industries has plumbed, an expert says.

Dave Coombes, 50, of Ballajura, is seeking compensation from the federal government of at least $1.8 million after a 12-year battle in which he lost everything.

The former franchisee of motor vehicle repairer Auto Masters is broke despite a successful court action against the company, which he was forced to fight on his own after the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission refused to help.

Apart from losing his business and house, the issue has taken a terrible toll on Mr Coombes' family, while friends and employees have sold possessions and even stopped cashing pay cheques to help his fight.

Franchising expert Frank Zumbo, an associate professor at the University of NSW school of business law and taxation, has studied the case.

"It's a real tragedy that's sadly becoming more common within the franchising sector," he said.

"Tragically it shows how a franchisee can be badly let down by the franchisor, the ACCC and the legal system."

Mr Zumbo said Mr Coombes had been left stranded by "an ACCC that repeatedly fails to pursue cases in a timely way and by a judicial system where legal costs can far exceed the amount in dispute".

"The ultimate injustice in this case is that a franchisee can lose everything even though the franchisee plays by the rules and is vindicated by a court," he said.

"There is something terribly wrong when the franchisee is left penniless despite winning in court."

It gave heart to "rogue franchisors" who could continue to destroy franchisees' lives and livelihoods "knowing full well that the chances of ACCC intervention are minimal and the risk of a franchisee taking legal action is extremely low".

"The case amply demonstrates the long overdue need for greater accountability surrounding the ACCC's handling of franchising investigations," Mr Zumbo said.

"The ACCC is a law unto itself when it comes to handling franchising matters and it's time there was an independent review of its approach to franchising complaints and investigations.

"Such a review needs to occur as a matter of urgency given the ever increasing levels of dissatisfaction expressed by franchisees about the ACCC's lack of action and leadership on franchising matters."

Mr Zumbo repeated his calls for a franchising ombudsman who could help resolve disputes before they headed to court.

"That's urgently needed as the ACCC's repeated failure to weed out rogue franchisors coupled with the rapidly escalating cost of getting justice through the legal system means that franchisees are being let down very badly."

Source: watoday.com.au

http://www.smh.com.au/wa-news/tragic-tale-a-classic-injustice-20100811-11zi0.html


Brought to you by WikidFranchise.org

Risks: Abuse of business, regulatory & political authority can destroy people, Access to justice, Affordable, early and non-legal dispute resolution mechanism, Any pretence will do, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, ACCC, Bankrupt, Beggars can't be choosers: take what you're given and shut up, Belief in a Just World (BJW): people deserve their fate, Bribery, Blame the victim, Bullying, Call for franchise law, Can’t afford to sue, Comments on article are interesting, Convicted felon, Corruption, Court decision favorable to franchisees, Court decision never covers all franchisee's loses, Credence goods: taking advantage of the innocents, David and Goliath story, Dispute resolution means franchisee goes broke, Don’t owe your lawyer money, Emboldens industry bottom-feeders, Expropriation without compensation, Extortion, False hope, Fee surprises at settlement time, Feeble enforcement and prosecution, Forced to sell, Franchisor picks up stores for a song, Franchise investors deprived of information, Franchisees are practice clients that help keep the lights on until franchisor clients show up, Franchisees' partners speak very powerfully, Franchising practiced the same, worldwide, Franchisor takes franchisee stores, Futility of taking legal action, Independence, Industry elites like this regulator, Industry in disrepute, Justice, Lost homes, Must sell business (eventually) through franchisor, Nothing but cold calculation, Offered much less than market value of franchise, Old-fashioned idea that politicians are relevant, Ombudsman, Only offered a fraction of what business is worth, Only 3 ways out: resell to next loser, independence & be sued or abandon and go bankrupt , Opportunism Test: If asset ownership were reversed, would decision likely change?, Outstanding investigative journalism, Pawns in a game they can't win, Refuses to answer journalist's questions, Regulator already has enough power but they don't use it, Regulators only pick on those who can't defend themselves, Regulatory capture breeds its own incompetence, Resale value set by franchisor, Retaliation, Scapegoating, Secret kickbacks and rebates, Should anyone trust anything associated with franchising anymore?, State refuses to even listen, State sanction, Strategic lawsuit against public participation, SLAPP, Success or failure have largely to do with luck, Sue the lawyer, Sue the regulator, Sunlight is the best disinfectant, Termination threats, The Fixer fixes for a hefty price, The game is rigged, Tip of the iceberg, Trade association fronts and defends best and worst franchisors, Trading in false hope, Trap for the trusting, Tremendous desire to warn others, Trial decision always appealed, Uncharacteristically shy with media requests, Unconscionable conduct, Undue influence, Unsafe at any Brand?, Veil of secrecy, Watchdog fails to bark, War of attrition, We will bankrupt you, Weak law worse than no law, Weapons of Influence: Authority, What does the independent franchisee association say?, Wild West of the business world, Withholds evidence in court proceedings, You'll sign anything to get 15% of what you put into it back, Australia, 20100811 Tragic tale

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License